Case study 13 Portfolio knowledge project

Fusion Finance Security Roles Model

A practical role design for finance users — job roles, duty separation, period close privileges, and access review rhythm that supports control without blocking work.

Knowledge / portfolio case study only. Not employment history, not a named client engagement, and not a certification claim.

Objective

Design a finance access model with clear separation of duties and usable day-to-day roles.

Context

Over-broad access creates audit risk; over-tight access creates workarounds.

Scope

Role catalog for AP/AR/GL/close, SoD checkpoints, access request path, and quarterly review. Not a full IAM implementation.

Approach

List personas → map duties → identify SoD conflicts → propose role bundles → define request/approval → test with sample users.

  1. 01
    Persona mapClerk, approver, accountant, closer.
  2. 02
    Duty analysisCreate, approve, post, close.
  3. 03
    SoD matrixConflicts and mitigations.
  4. 04
    Role bundlesUsable packaged access.
  5. 05
    Review rhythmQuarterly attestation.
01Persona map
02Duty analysis
03SoD matrix
04Role bundles

Fusion Finance Security Roles Model

Phased approach diagram for this knowledge project.

Key design decisions

Prefer fewer well-named roles
Easier to govern.
Break glass access is temporary
Always expire.
Close privileges are restricted
Period status is sensitive.

Walkthrough

AP clerk posts invoice but cannot approve → approver cannot create supplier bank change → closer opens/closes periods → review access extract.

Controls

No combined create+approve for high-risk duties; privileged access time-bound; quarterly access attestation.

Oracle modules in focus

Security Console GL AP AR

Deliverables

Persona-role matrix SoD conflict list access request form UAT access scenarios.

Outcomes

Shows control-aware Fusion finance security thinking.

← Previous: Multi-Ledger Next: Budget Control →